This course has finally come to an end, and I can only say I'm exceptionally pleased about that. I won't have to waste anymore time jumping through pointless hoops practicing seldom-used skills that I already have or could easily figure out unassisted had I either the need or the desire to do so. It would seem that my views run contrary to those of many students, including Samantha Chambers, but such is life.
Honestly, the online portfolio is of limited value to me. I already have an electronic copy of my hard copy employment portfolio, and it comes complete with items demonstrating computer proficiency.
For all that Facebook, Twitter, etc. can be used to make one look more professional, the reality of the internet is that they seldom are used to that end, and I still believe the perception of most employers is that the use of such media is a distant tertiary at best as a qualification in anything but public relations.
I have learned nothing about my writing ability; only confirmed that it is above average, and I have learned nothing about myself as journalist, as I was already very proficient in using media to research ends. I see the role of technology in my own research remaining large, as it has been for the last several years.
All in all, this course has added nothing to my life, save perhaps for a stomach ulcer from the agitation at having to give up time to engage in media forms that do not pique my interest, and the general banality of which irk me. I suppose my feeling are most accurately expressed in the following blog:
http://rptrcub.blogspot.com/2009_04_12_archive.html
Here are the links to pages I commented on. Trying to figure out this junk extended me past the deadline. Again, I am so glad that this damned course is over.
http://ales-204.blogspot.com/2011/11/social-media-and-ales204-students.html
http://ales-204.blogspot.com/2011/10/lecture-19-reviewing-science-articles.html
http://ales-204.blogspot.com/2011/10/infographic-world-food-crisis.html?showComment=1323304567385#c719400758159365985
http://ales-204.blogspot.com/2011/10/lecture-16-cv-writing-workshop.html
http://ales-204.blogspot.com/2011/09/lecture-11-guest-lecture.html
Communication
Wednesday, 7 December 2011
Communication in Real Life
I had an interesting experience in communication a couple of weeks back, and I thought I'd go ahead and share to interested readers, should they ever find themselves in similar circumstances. As this post is relevant to both cooking and shopping, Samantha Chambers might be interested in it. If you want to see her blog, it is here:
http://samanthachambersales204.blogspot.com/
It all started with birthday money and some dull knives.
Most people, the reader included probably don't know much about knife sharpening, so I'll provide a brief introduction ot the topic here. A knife is really nothing more than a fine wedge. The shallower the angel of the wedge, the sharper the blade. A shallower angle also means a knife that dulls faster, and so picking an angle for a knife edge is always a trade-off between durability and sharpness.
When a knife dulls, what is really happening is that the wedge that makes a blade sharp is folding over, so that when you apply pressure, it is no longer applied directly to the knife edge. This edge can be unfolded many times by the use of a steel, seen here:
And a video on its use here:
http://video.about.com/housewares/How-to-Use-a-Knife-Steel.htm
Eventually, however, this edge will break off where it folds. At this point, a new edge must be ground onto the blade. What one will find is that there are very few professionals doing this, and even fewer that do it by hand. This is important, as if a machine is used, the knife edge can be overheated, and the steel will loose its temper. Temper is what determines the tensile strength of steel. Too high, and you have a spring. Too low, and you have something as brittle as glass. Neither extreme makes a good cutting edge. A good site for knife sharpening can be found here:
http://www.wikihow.com/Sharpen-a-Knife
Which brings us to my dull knives that are beyond unfolding to make the edge keen once more, and some birthday money.
I stopped by a knife store (or rather a store that sells knives among other things) and inquired about sharpening kits that would provide a course stone to allow me to put an entirely new edge on my blade, and that also had a fool-proof guide for keeping an accurate and consistent angle in the process. The clerk assured me that the product they carried met such specifications, and, upon my inquiry, informed me that goods that did not perform as advertised could be returned for store credit or exchange, which I thought was reasonable. I made the $100.00 purchase.
Before using the item, I decided to use social media to get some product reviews, only to discover that the kit I bought neither possessed a fool-proof angle guide nor a coarse stone option (the company's coarse stone was in fact only a medium grit). Somewhat miffed, I decided I'd return the product unused for a refund, as it was in fact not as I had been told by the sales clerk and therefore not suitable to my purposes. I looked at the receipt to check the return window, only to find the return policy printed in full, but at odds with what I had been told. On it, the exchange/store credit policy extended to unused goods as well, which I had not been informed of, and which I did not think was reasonable at all, particularly as I had not been informed of this caveat prior to making the purchase of a product that had been deliberately misrepresented to me.
Expecting the citation of the store policy, I went through the likely scenario in my mind, and prepared counter-arguments for each contingency I could foresee. My entire premise was that is was not fair to hold one to a contract unknowingly entered via the sale of a deliberately misrepresented durable good of significant cost, especially when the details of said contract were not made clear prior to the sale. I even went so far as to look into grounds for civil lawsuit regarding product misrepresentation, in case I needed a strong and believable bluff to force the stores hand into breaking policy and offering a refund, should they prove particularly obstinate (some irony here, I know).
The next day, I went to the store, took deep breath, and approached the counter. As predicted, before I had even finished explaining what I wanted and why, the clerk told me that they can only do store credit or exchange. I did a fair impression of the indignant surprise I experienced when I had read the receipt the night before, and said, in the most genuine and politely miffed tone I could muster, that "I was not informed of that prior to the sale". I then had a stroke of manipulating genius and told her I would look around the store and see if there was anything else of value that would render store credit acceptable. Of course there wasn't, but I made the gesture anyway to appear exceptionally reasonable.
When I again approached the counter and informed the clerk of my finding, she again cited the return policy and pointed it out on the receipt you get after the sale (I think even she realized the idiocy of that as fair warning) and pointed to a sign on the wall. After a few seconds of neck-craning to see around a large piece of tinsel on the register, I was able to notice the sign angled away from the register. I imagine my expression indicated what i thought of its placement. I was then pawned off on another clerk who seemed to know something about the product, and his description confirmed what I had already learned, although it took some effort to make him admit this fact. After mentioning product misrepresentation a few more times, and stressing the fraudulent nature of the initial sale and lack of information regarding the return policy, I was presented with the argument that the till wouldn't permit either of them to issue a refund. I was about to request that they get someone that could, although I gather that the clerk realized as much, as she finally capitulated to my demand, and I was issued my refund. I was rather pleased, as I could then take my $100 and use it to buy a knife sharpening set that was better suited to my needs for half the price. I didn't even have to use my prepared bluff.
So, the next time you get swindled on a sale and want a policy-violating refund, just remember that a well laid, logical argument and steadfast persistence to the point of being border-line obnoxious can allow you to prevail.
And that, readers, is the sort of thing that social media cannot do.
http://samanthachambersales204.blogspot.com/
It all started with birthday money and some dull knives.
Most people, the reader included probably don't know much about knife sharpening, so I'll provide a brief introduction ot the topic here. A knife is really nothing more than a fine wedge. The shallower the angel of the wedge, the sharper the blade. A shallower angle also means a knife that dulls faster, and so picking an angle for a knife edge is always a trade-off between durability and sharpness.
When a knife dulls, what is really happening is that the wedge that makes a blade sharp is folding over, so that when you apply pressure, it is no longer applied directly to the knife edge. This edge can be unfolded many times by the use of a steel, seen here:
And a video on its use here:
http://video.about.com/housewares/How-to-Use-a-Knife-Steel.htm
Eventually, however, this edge will break off where it folds. At this point, a new edge must be ground onto the blade. What one will find is that there are very few professionals doing this, and even fewer that do it by hand. This is important, as if a machine is used, the knife edge can be overheated, and the steel will loose its temper. Temper is what determines the tensile strength of steel. Too high, and you have a spring. Too low, and you have something as brittle as glass. Neither extreme makes a good cutting edge. A good site for knife sharpening can be found here:
http://www.wikihow.com/Sharpen-a-Knife
Which brings us to my dull knives that are beyond unfolding to make the edge keen once more, and some birthday money.
I stopped by a knife store (or rather a store that sells knives among other things) and inquired about sharpening kits that would provide a course stone to allow me to put an entirely new edge on my blade, and that also had a fool-proof guide for keeping an accurate and consistent angle in the process. The clerk assured me that the product they carried met such specifications, and, upon my inquiry, informed me that goods that did not perform as advertised could be returned for store credit or exchange, which I thought was reasonable. I made the $100.00 purchase.
Before using the item, I decided to use social media to get some product reviews, only to discover that the kit I bought neither possessed a fool-proof angle guide nor a coarse stone option (the company's coarse stone was in fact only a medium grit). Somewhat miffed, I decided I'd return the product unused for a refund, as it was in fact not as I had been told by the sales clerk and therefore not suitable to my purposes. I looked at the receipt to check the return window, only to find the return policy printed in full, but at odds with what I had been told. On it, the exchange/store credit policy extended to unused goods as well, which I had not been informed of, and which I did not think was reasonable at all, particularly as I had not been informed of this caveat prior to making the purchase of a product that had been deliberately misrepresented to me.
Expecting the citation of the store policy, I went through the likely scenario in my mind, and prepared counter-arguments for each contingency I could foresee. My entire premise was that is was not fair to hold one to a contract unknowingly entered via the sale of a deliberately misrepresented durable good of significant cost, especially when the details of said contract were not made clear prior to the sale. I even went so far as to look into grounds for civil lawsuit regarding product misrepresentation, in case I needed a strong and believable bluff to force the stores hand into breaking policy and offering a refund, should they prove particularly obstinate (some irony here, I know).
The next day, I went to the store, took deep breath, and approached the counter. As predicted, before I had even finished explaining what I wanted and why, the clerk told me that they can only do store credit or exchange. I did a fair impression of the indignant surprise I experienced when I had read the receipt the night before, and said, in the most genuine and politely miffed tone I could muster, that "I was not informed of that prior to the sale". I then had a stroke of manipulating genius and told her I would look around the store and see if there was anything else of value that would render store credit acceptable. Of course there wasn't, but I made the gesture anyway to appear exceptionally reasonable.
When I again approached the counter and informed the clerk of my finding, she again cited the return policy and pointed it out on the receipt you get after the sale (I think even she realized the idiocy of that as fair warning) and pointed to a sign on the wall. After a few seconds of neck-craning to see around a large piece of tinsel on the register, I was able to notice the sign angled away from the register. I imagine my expression indicated what i thought of its placement. I was then pawned off on another clerk who seemed to know something about the product, and his description confirmed what I had already learned, although it took some effort to make him admit this fact. After mentioning product misrepresentation a few more times, and stressing the fraudulent nature of the initial sale and lack of information regarding the return policy, I was presented with the argument that the till wouldn't permit either of them to issue a refund. I was about to request that they get someone that could, although I gather that the clerk realized as much, as she finally capitulated to my demand, and I was issued my refund. I was rather pleased, as I could then take my $100 and use it to buy a knife sharpening set that was better suited to my needs for half the price. I didn't even have to use my prepared bluff.
So, the next time you get swindled on a sale and want a policy-violating refund, just remember that a well laid, logical argument and steadfast persistence to the point of being border-line obnoxious can allow you to prevail.
And that, readers, is the sort of thing that social media cannot do.
Monday, 14 November 2011
Wiki-Woes
Well, I completed my Wikipedia stub entry, and it was nothing short of sheer hell. Of course its woefully late, but that's what comes of forgetting about the due date until it arrived, procrastinating, and grossly underestimating the required time. Once I picked a suitable topic, I got over all that.
And so it was that I ran head on, so-to-speak, into the mystifying world of Wiki-code. I have never in my life attempted any sort of computer programing before this, and to say it was a steep learning curve is quite the understatement.
As the 75% late penalty approached, my anxiety increased, and I focused on this pointless quest of Wiki-expansion and battled the army of Wiki-code with all the zeal anyone could...for eight hours...And then, completion!
At this stage, it occurred to me that I should put an image of Agropyron cristatum into the article to supplement the one already there. I searched the web, found and copied the image, and went to my version of the blog in the edit section...and right-clicked...and lost it all, to be left with nothing but the half-complete, muddle-referenced version of my masterpiece that my Wiki-acquaintance from across the world left.
And so it was that I ran head on, so-to-speak, into the mystifying world of Wiki-code. I have never in my life attempted any sort of computer programing before this, and to say it was a steep learning curve is quite the understatement.
As the 75% late penalty approached, my anxiety increased, and I focused on this pointless quest of Wiki-expansion and battled the army of Wiki-code with all the zeal anyone could...for eight hours...And then, completion!
...But life is never that easy.
Much to my dismay, I discovered that some ne'er-do-well on the other side of the globe had been rearranging my code even as I conquered it. So when I went to save my completed article, I was confronted with the following: "There has been an editing conflict. You will need to merge the two codes together." or something to that effect, in addition to another message from my effort under-miner: "Welcome to Wikipedia. Your referencing wasn't in the correct format. I made a few changes. Let me know if there are any problems." Or something to that effect.
Well that's just Wonderful, I thought...
![]() |
You +1'd this publicly. Undo en.wikipedia.org |

...Needless to say, I was more than a bit miffed.
After taking a walk, I returned to write my second coded article Agropyron cristatum. My previous experience meant that this one only took three hours, as I had the code more or less figured out, and my Word article already done.
So, Here's the link to my Wiki:
...And here's a screenshot:
(I got some help from Laura. you can see her blog here: http://laura-everything-ag.blogspot.com/)
In reflection of this exercise, I come to conclude, as I have with all our social media endeavors, that the stress of using them heavily far outweighs any benefit. I don't need to war with code to benefit from Wikipedia. I suppose that school and life both involve a lot of jumping through hoops to earn your meat. As long as you clear the flame, I suppose it doesn't much matter whether the exercise has any useful purpose or not.
You +1'd this publicly. Undo benblitch.blogspot.com |
Sunday, 25 September 2011
My Facebook page
Today I created a Facebook page to act as a professional profile for myself. It proved to be by far the most frustrating, agitating experience of my week due to technical issues with formatting for Flickr.
This page was created to fulfill the requirements of a class I am in. It hosts my resume on it, and lists some of my larger personal interest, and provides contact information for prospective employers. At the base of this post, one can see a screenshot image of the page.
You can view this page by visiting:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Sean-Surkan/297178640298768#!/pages/Sean-Surkan/297178640298768?sk=info
Until next post,
Sean
This page was created to fulfill the requirements of a class I am in. It hosts my resume on it, and lists some of my larger personal interest, and provides contact information for prospective employers. At the base of this post, one can see a screenshot image of the page.
You can view this page by visiting:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Sean-Surkan/297178640298768#!/pages/Sean-Surkan/297178640298768?sk=info
Until next post,
Sean
Friday, 16 September 2011
Communication Post #1
I'm Sean. I'm studying for a bachelor's degree in Environmental and Conservation Sciences, with a major in land reclamation and a major in wildlife and rangeland management. According ot my transcripts, I'm in my third year, although this is only my second year at U of A (I gained transfer credit from Lethbridge College).
Within my field of study, communication has a huge role, as ideas must be shared between people to achieve reclamation objectives or coordinate activities in a research study; whether that be between clients and consultants, or between consultants and subcontractors, or between professionals and the general public.
Communication plays a larger role in human interaction than raw knowledge, as it is what people see first. Ideas only spread or take hold when someone is willing to listen, and how one communicates an idea is what makes or breaks its success or failure as far as the involvement of others is concerned.
Within the scientific community, communication takes on a similar role, but can be even more relevant, as ideas must be exchanged for the community to function as an effective tool in the discovery and distribution of new knowledge.
In short, unless one is isolated from the rest of the world, communication is everything for getting by when faced with human interaction.
Within my field of study, communication has a huge role, as ideas must be shared between people to achieve reclamation objectives or coordinate activities in a research study; whether that be between clients and consultants, or between consultants and subcontractors, or between professionals and the general public.
Communication plays a larger role in human interaction than raw knowledge, as it is what people see first. Ideas only spread or take hold when someone is willing to listen, and how one communicates an idea is what makes or breaks its success or failure as far as the involvement of others is concerned.
Within the scientific community, communication takes on a similar role, but can be even more relevant, as ideas must be exchanged for the community to function as an effective tool in the discovery and distribution of new knowledge.
In short, unless one is isolated from the rest of the world, communication is everything for getting by when faced with human interaction.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)